SUB-INDEX

Integrity and anti-corruption

This sub-index assesses how systematically the city authorities work in the area of integrity, including the work of authorized units (persons), publication of monitoring results on the current anti-corruption situation, and cases of violations of anti-corruption legislation by officials.

AVERAGE SCORE
49.7 out of 100
Highest score 67.0 Lutsk
Lowest score 30.0 Odesa
11 cities assessed

Results by sub-index

Score for each city by sub-index and the number of indicators fully implemented. The average score changes depending on the selected filters.

Average score 49.7
Results by sub-index
# City
1 Lutsk Large
67.0
27 of 40
2 Khmelnytskyi Large
63.0
25 of 40
3 Kyiv Large
61.0
19 of 40
3 Zaporizhia Large
61.0
24 of 40
5 Lviv Large
53.0
22 of 40
5 Kropyvnytskyi Large
53.0
21 of 40
7 Kharkiv Large
49.0
19 of 40
8 Dnipro Large
39.0
16 of 40
9 Chernihiv Large
36.0
14 of 40
10 Poltava Large
35.0
14 of 40
11 Odesa Large
30.0
12 of 40

Indicators

40 criteria used to assess the “integrity and anti-corruption” sub-index.

01 Does the city council's official website have a separate section dedicated to preventing and combating corruption? Details Collapse

What is assessed

Maximum score: 3

Does the city council's official website have a separate section dedicated to preventing and combating corruption?

Result 2025

10out of 11 cities

fully implemented the indicator

02 Does the separate section dedicated to preventing and combating corruption publish a link to the regulation on the authorized unit (authorized officer) for corruption prevention and detection approved by the city council? Details Collapse

What is assessed

Maximum score: 2

Does the separate section dedicated to preventing and combating corruption publish a link to the regulation on the authorized unit (authorized officer) for corruption prevention and detection approved by the city council?

Result 2025

5out of 11 cities

fully implemented the indicator

03 Does the regulation on the authorized unit (authorized officer) for corruption prevention and detection assign the task of endorsing draft legal regulations of the local self-government body? Details Collapse

What is assessed

Maximum score: 2

Does the regulation on the authorized unit (authorized officer) for corruption prevention and detection assign the task of endorsing draft legal regulations of the local self-government body?

Result 2025

4out of 11 cities

fully implemented the indicator

04 Does the separate section dedicated to preventing and combating corruption publish the contact details of the authorized unit (authorized officer) for corruption prevention and detection? Details Collapse

What is assessed

Maximum score: 2

Does the separate section dedicated to preventing and combating corruption publish the contact details of the authorized unit (authorized officer) for corruption prevention and detection?

Result 2025

4out of 11 cities

fully implemented the indicator

05 Did the city council in 2025 avoid designating its authorized officer for corruption prevention and detection by assigning the authorized officer's functions to one of the city council's existing officials? Details Collapse

What is assessed

Maximum score: 2

Did the city council in 2025 avoid designating its authorized officer for corruption prevention and detection by assigning the authorized officer's functions to one of the city council's existing officials?

Result 2025

10out of 11 cities

fully implemented the indicator

06 Does the separate section dedicated to preventing and combating corruption publish a link to the page of the city council standing committee whose remit covers corruption prevention? Details Collapse

What is assessed

Maximum score: 2

Does the separate section dedicated to preventing and combating corruption publish a link to the page of the city council standing committee whose remit covers corruption prevention?

Result 2025

0out of 11 cities

fully implemented the indicator

07 Did the city council standing committee whose remit covers corruption prevention hold meetings in 2025? Details Collapse

What is assessed

Maximum score: 2

Did the city council standing committee whose remit covers corruption prevention hold meetings in 2025?

Result 2025

9out of 11 cities

fully implemented the indicator

08 Does the separate section dedicated to preventing and combating corruption publish a link to the administrative document establishing the working group on assessing corruption risks in the activities of the city council and its executive bodies? Details Collapse

What is assessed

Maximum score: 2

Does the separate section dedicated to preventing and combating corruption publish a link to the administrative document establishing the working group on assessing corruption risks in the activities of the city council and its executive bodies?

Result 2025

2out of 11 cities

fully implemented the indicator